Buddhist Refuge in the Trump Era

From Lion’s Roar newsletter:

Why this gay Buddhist teacher is dubious about Buddhist refuge in the Trump era

I love you, Western Buddhism, but as a gay man, I find your privileged lack of urgency in the wake of the election of Donald Trump disturbing. This is not a new feeling for me.

Last week, someone sent me a link to the LionsRoar.com article, “Buddhist Teachers Respond to Trump’s Presidential Win.” Several Buddhist teachers had written a paragraph or two offering their wisdom. As I read, I felt a very familiar disappointment and anger arising in me. While some of the entries were good enough (invariably the ones from people of color), most left me feeling that these were the words of people who don’t know what it’s like to be on the receiving end of oppression under a conservative government. People with no skin in the game. Certainly, these are not the words I’m hearing from my black female best friend, my Mexican American niece, or my trans friend.

I had an experience a few years ago which transformed me as a Buddhist teacher: a non-white male student of mine told me about coming to our center during the week that news of Trayvon Martin’s murder broke in the national media. He spoke of how no one in our mostly white sangha seemed to know that it had happened and how the teachers didn’t mention it. For him, Trayvon’s murder was monumental, the only thing on his mind. As a white teacher, I wondered if I had been one who dropped the ball. As a gay person, I know what it’s like to not see the weight of your grief reflected or honored in the places where you seek refuge.

As I read the Lions Roar piece, that feeling of not being seen came up when I read statements like one that said if we could get through Nixon, Reagan, and Bush, we could get through this too. I thought to myself: who’s the “we” that got through Reagan and Bush? The Reagan/Bush era was an absolute horror for my community. An entire generation of intellectuals, artists, friends, and lovers didn’t “make it” through Reagan and Bush. Two decades later, I worked on a suicide prevention line for gay teens during the George W. Bush administration. Lots of them didn’t “make it,” either. Such a sentiment, however encouraging, erases queer history. By “we” the author appears to signify only people who aren’t the targets of explicitly racist, sexist, and homophobic policies of historically Republican governments. Those who weren’t moved by desperation to dump the ashes of their dead lovers on the White House lawn (as AIDS activists did in 1992 under President Bush) in a vain attempt to get the government to give a shit that we were dying.

Those of us who are members of marginalized populations are experiencing this election as a trauma. A legitimate threat! It provokes our very real traumatic histories.

My own community’s collective history includes physical violence, social ostracizing, the wholesale abandonment of our families, and a lack of safety in just about every institution that matters. Police, enforcing the state’s (historically conservative anti-gay) laws have for decades brutalized gay and transgender people. In our schools, most of us feel or have felt unsafe, often without any advocates, while curricula taught us nothing of our own our history. The medical establishment pathologized our sexuality and brutalized us with electro-shock, “drowning” medication, castration, and lobotomy. By and large the religious right has been THE driving force of hatred towards LGBTQ people. In the 1980’s, the government, under Reagan, had a top-down mandate that nothing having to do with gay people (including AIDS!) would make any Republican agenda. That cruel mandate held for all eight years of his administration. You can go on YouTube and listen to audio of Reagan’s press secretary repeatedly mocking us while our people died.

Many of us are living with socially conditioned shame and internalized homophobia (if not outright self-hatred) as we navigate a society engaged in a constant debate about whether we are worthwhile human beings or not. Even today, staying safe means we must police our speech, our words, our voices, our clothes, what we express interest in or excitement about. The oppression gets at us from every angle. I have never had a public moment of affection for another man, gay or straight, without assessing my surroundings for safety. That is trauma. Women, transgender folks, people of color, Mexican Americans, immigrants, native people, differently abled people, and those with intersectional identities (and the list goes on) all have their own distinct trauma histories which are being triggered this week.

Western Buddhists, during times like this we need more from you than standard-issue statements admonishing us to “sit with our fear and sadness.” We’re already experts! We need safety. We need to know you see us. We need to know you can receive the enormity of what we are carrying. And we need protection.

Here’s what I would have written for that article:

  • First, a self-centered mindfulness practice is not enough. While non-reactive presence to what’s happening within you and around you is foundational, for me non-reactivity simply creates the conditions for a wise response. Non-reactivity is not the end game. Action is! Please don’t be another privileged person who thinks sitting with YOUR sadness is enough. It’s not!
  • Practitioners of mindfulness are extremely well positioned to dismantle implicit bias. As a gay man, when I look into the depths of my own being I find homophobia. I also find misogyny and white supremacy. If your mindfulness practice is not yet aimed at your own bias, or if you still think bias is not within you, I’m sorry to say, you’re part of the problem.
  • Across traditions, our central commitment is to safety for all beings. When people in trauma feel threatened, they need safety. Buddhists, you must transform your centers into places of explicit safety. That safety doesn’t exist because you sit on your ass and wish for it. It exists in the resonant field of recognition and representation. We need to see and hear ourselves in your teachings. We need you to mention the issues. We need to know you UNDERSTAND the issues. Which means you need to put down your usual dharma book and pick up Ta-Nehisi Coates or Lillian Faderman or Kate Bornstein!
  • We need to know you believe us! Don’t dismiss us with comments about a lack of equanimity. In dharma centers across the nation, people are working overtime simply to stay in a room where they are the only person of color or trans person they see.
  • Your “right speech” practice should include confronting oppressive language in yourself and others in your day-to-day life. Use your words to insert yourself between marginalized people and their aggressors.
  • Don’t engage in spiritual bypassing. Don’t invoke “impermanence” or “the truth of dukkha” or the “ultimate truth of no self” as a way of normalizing Trump, minimizing people’s trauma, regulating your own feelings, or as a justification for inaction or checking out. I don’t get to check out! You shouldn’t either. After all, we’re all against delusion, right?
  • Your generosity practice should include giving to organizations that will sustain and protect those who have the most to lose.
  • While it’s fine to try to “understand” those who voted for Donald Trump, your compassion is, in my opinion, misplaced — or at best, incomplete. Calls for compassion and understanding for Trump supporters without an equally urgent call for the protection of those who are profoundly threatened by this administration have a flavor of bias similar to that which let “Stanford Rapist” Brock Turner off the hook. Can we, who are supposed to be more awake, please not do that thing where we jump right to compassion for the aggressors who voted for an explicitly  homophobic, sexist, racist, violent president that’s readying an all-out assault on vulnerable people?
  • And for the love of Buddha, stop telling us not to be angry. Anger is an appropriate response. In the trauma world, we see anger is the energy that naturally organizes in a person to support a self-protective response to threat! The very movement of trauma resolution is from disempowered collapse into an empowered, self-protective response. Yes, anger demands mindfulness to relate to it skillfully but I think it is an exquisite fuel for change. That’s what it’s there for! Gay advocacy groups like the Gay Liberation Front and Gay Activists Alliance in the 1970’s, as well as the people who rioted at LA’s Black Cat Tavern and New York’s Stonewall Inn in the late 60’s were justifiably angry and put this culture on notice! Act Up, the AIDS advocacy group so active in the 80’s and 90’s, transformed the AIDS crisis by channeling their appropriate anger into direct action. In my view, Act Up was one of the most effective forces for change the modern world has ever seen.

While I acknowledge many Buddhists are, in fact, engaged in social-justice work, not nearly enough of you understand trauma. Find out. You may be surprised, for example, to learn that meditative interventions which are helpful for a person with a nervous system which has not been impacted by trauma might be counterproductive or even harmful to a person with a trauma history. We in the trauma field are constantly working to repair the harm done by mindfulness teachers who have no education about trauma or who believe the dharma is itself a sufficient path to the resolution of trauma. I can’t say this firmly enough: It isn’t!

What I want to say is this: it’s time to wake the wakeful! If your practice is only about you and you are not really standing in the margins with the most vulnerable members of society for the next four years, then for me, your compassion and wisdom are impotent.

I’m angry, I’m not sorry, and I will resist!

Pablo Das is a Buddhist teacher, musician, amateur queer historian and a practitioner of somatic experiencing. He has a one-on-one coaching practice specializing in integrating Buddhist practice and principles in the resolution of trauma. He lives in Los Angeles.

8 thoughts on “Buddhist Refuge in the Trump Era

  1. While I agree with most of the author’s points, I think he misinterpreted the call for compassion for Trump’s supporters. He equals compassion to weak complacency or indulgence of crime. What standford rapist got was not compassion. Compassion sees humanities in the person who committed the violence, but stands firm against the damaging consequences of violence. I still stand strong in believing in the humanities in Trump supporters. And that does not make me just sit in my home on my meditation cushions. True compassion will mobilize people.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Spring, I don’t think he would disagree with you. I think his point was that compassion without action is not actually true. It may be surrounded by all sorts of rationalizations for non-action, but we all have “skin in the game” whether we choose to realize it or not. To claim compassion, even extending it to those with whom you disagree, does not absolve us from giving it form in ways that will mobilize others.


  2. Gary, I don’t think Compassion in its original meaning ever implies inaction. One can not help being moved when True Compassion ripples through one’s body, firing up neuronal patterns, and rearranging hormonal profiles. In fact, True Compassion will compel the person to find the Right Action, action that maybe never attempted before by any human. I feel very sad that the dualistic mind that is so fundamental in the western ideology has split True Compassion into compassion with or without action, which completely misses the point. Buddhism is trying to point out to the vast, hidden territory between reactive action and passive inaction. Most activists I encounter today do not see the dark and little-trodden path in between the two. With the dualistic mind, they simply can not see it. I totally respect activists and I think they are doing a job that needs to be done. But what if evolution is calling forth a totally new way of addressing the root cause of this political disasters we are facing right now? A way that lies outside the known reality? In my own work, I am doing everything I can trying to figure out a way to shine light on this dark, hidden path. Because I can’t tread on this alone, I want comrades and companions. And I need to shine a beacon to call out for allies. I haven’t found a way yet, but I am trying.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Completely agree with you, Spring. In reading more thoroughly the original article upon which this author was commenting, it is clear that the majority of speakers are implying that action accompanies compassion. They speak of mobilizing and communicating or other forms of moving beyond separation. What follows authentic compassion is some gesture to relieve suffering. An important part of the message here–to me–is that reaction does not necessarily relieve suffering. We have to contemplate “right action.” And neither inaction, out of taking a “long view” nor by overlooking the fact that all of us have “skin in the game,” will relieve the more immediate suffering that can be addressed.
      One more thing: the duality you speak of may in part arise because we don’t attribute value to actions that cannot be measured. Compassion is an action in itself. It may not be sufficient for those who seek immediate material remedies for suffering, but that doesn’t mean someone who is not acting in a visible way can be invalidated.


      • Thank you Gary. You articulated it really well. I think my comments are not about the original article. They came from the loneliness and fear of being called to throwing myself into those invisible actions that are not measured or validated. But I also have the feeling that I am not alone here. I see signs of a lot of people doing these invisible acts. I have a desire to call out those invisible actions and organize ourselves into a force, unknown on the current stage yet. Thanks for holding space for this!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s